One of the most common reasons technology costs spiral is simple – organisations do not have a clear view of what they are paying for, how it is being used, or what value it delivers. In fact, 54% of organisations identify lack of visibility into usage and efficiency as the leading source of wasted cloud spend, and only 30% can accurately attribute their cloud costs to specific teams, products, or outcomes.
Cloud platforms, data services, and software subscriptions generate vast amounts of usage data, but that data is rarely structured in a way that supports decision-making. Costs are often aggregated at account or vendor level, disconnected from teams, products, or outcomes. The result is a fundamental control problem: you cannot optimise what you cannot see.
AI-driven visibility changes this dynamic.
As technology estates grow, several factors undermine transparency:

The result is delayed insight. Research shows that 78% of organisations detect cloud cost variances too late – by the time cost reports surface issues, the decisions that caused them are long past. With 66% of cloud waste stemming from idle or underused resources, this visibility gap translates directly into financial waste.
AI systems can analyse raw consumption data and infer structure that humans struggle to maintain manually. This includes:
Instead of relying on perfect data hygiene, organisations gain insight even when inputs are imperfect. This is critical in environments where resources are provisioned continuously and tagging discipline inevitably degrades over time.
Traditional cost reporting answers the question "how much did we spend". AI-driven visibility focuses on "why are we spending this way" and "what will happen next".
This shift enables earlier intervention. Teams can see the financial impact of their decisions while systems are running, not weeks later during review cycles. Organisations that implement automated, real-time cost monitoring reduce unexpected cost incidents by 35% compared to those relying on manual monthly reviews.

Visibility alone does not reduce costs. It must be delivered in a way that supports action:
AI enables this by continuously analysing usage and highlighting areas where intervention will have the greatest impact. The difference between reactive and proactive cost management often comes down to the quality and timeliness of visibility.
Many organisations struggle not because they lack data, but because they lack a coherent approach to turning data into control.
It's important to design your operating models with visibility built into how platforms are run, not bolted on afterwards. This includes aligning technical telemetry with business structure and decision-making.
If you’re unsure where your organisation stands today, our free AI-readiness review can help establish a clear baseline. Understanding your current visibility gaps is the first step towards regaining control.
Want to see what other articles are available in this series? Visit the topic index page for a full breakdown.